A week has gone by since Stan Wawrinka hit the winning point and won the French Open. His successful coach Magnus Norman is back in Sweden. SweTennis spoke with the Filipstad native about what is most important for a coach of a top player and of his feelings after the win.
“The two minutes Stan and I had in the dressing room after the final—they’re moments you remember.” Magnus Norman
Magnus Norman isn’t someone who needs big headlines. Since Stan Wawrinka’s win in Paris, he’s been praised by all; but Magnus keeps both feet firmly planted on the ground and almost excuses himself for being called the world’s best coach. When, on the Good to Greats home page, he wrote down his thoughts after Wawrinka’s win he was was praised as much for his wise words as his coaching role with Wawrinka.
No time to enjoy
Magnus has now been home in Sweden for a few days, and on Tuesday it’s his Good to Great job that’s the focus. On Wednesday it’s back to London where Wawrinka’s grass season starts. Has he managed to land after the Paris success?
“I haven’t had time to enjoy it, actually. So much happened after the final, but Stan and I had a couple of minutes together in the dressing room after the match. Those are the moments you remember,” says Norman.
Raised his game at the right moments
Stan Wawrinka announced his separation form his wife in the middle of April, and there was a question whether he could steady himself mentally.
“The mental part, it’s no secret. We worked well day-to-day since Monaco. Every day was focused on the right things. After, Stan has managed to raise his level at the right moments when he’s had self-belief.”
Many ask what the most important job is for the coach of a top player, the mental or the tactical.
“It depends on the individual’s reactions in different situations. It can vary day to day and match to match. It’s up to me as coach to figure out what’s most important for the player on the day.”
He’s made some tactical mistakes himself.
“I’ve made a ton of bad decisions through the years when I coached important matches. [For example,] in London, when Stan played serve and volley against Federer on match point.”
There’s a hair’s breadth difference between genius and folly
“If it had worked, it would have been a brilliant tactic. But it didn’t and the whole world questioned it. The margins are very small and it’s a personal choice every time.”